Skip Navigation

New Battleground Poll Data Shows Disability Community is Large and Electorally Contested

Washington, D.C., March 19 – New polling data of the battleground states shows that the disability community is large and electorally contested, but the issues they care about most are not being sufficiently addressed.

The phone poll of 1,000 registered voters across 16 presidential and Senate battleground states was conducted by Stan Greenberg, Ph.D., and the polling firm Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research (GQRR), on behalf of the disability inclusion organization RespectAbility. The data was released on a webinar earlier today. The memocross-tab data, and PowerPoint are available to download now. The webinar recording will be available to watch with captions early next week.

The key findings of the poll include:

The disability community is more than half the battleground.

More than half of the electorate in the battleground (59 percent) self-identifies as having a disability (16 percent), having a family member with a disability (32 percent) or having a close friend with a disability (11 percent).

The disability community in the battleground states resembles voters overall—white (73 percent) and people of color (26 percent), college graduate (60 percent) and non-college graduate voters (36 percent), urban (54 percent) and rural voters (46 percent).

The disability community is electorally contested.

These voters lean slightly more Democratic than voters outside of the disability community, but they are still politically contested at the presidential, Senate, and Congressional level. Their support for Democratic candidates is virtually identical to voters overall, though voters facing a personal disability are slightly more Democratic than the broader disability community.

The disability community is focused on issues that directly impact their lives.

Voters in this community focus more on Social Security and Medicare than voters overall, and voters facing personal disabilities are far and away the most likely to cite government disfunction and prescription drug prices as important issues.

The disability community’s agenda draws broad public support but is not being addressed.
As you think about whom to support for President, how important is it to you that the candidates have campaign events and websites that are open and accessible to people with disabilities, just like everyone else? Bar chart. Total: 69 Very Important 21 Somewhat Important Disability Community: 73 Very Important, 18 Somewhat important

Voters broadly agree that presidential campaigns should be made accessible to people with disabilities. A 90 percent majority of voters overall and a 91 percent of voters in the disability community believe it is very or somewhat important candidates for presidential candidates to make their campaign accessible. These views have intensity, with a 69 percent majority of voters overall and a 73 percent majority of voters in the disability community who find it very important candidates make their campaign accessible.

Similarly, broad majorities of voters describe themselves as more likely to support candidates who ensure children with disabilities get the education and training they need to succeed, and similar majorities describe themselves as more likely to support candidates who back job and career opportunities for people with disabilities. The intensity of these issues is nearly as high among voters overall as it is in the disability community.

“The disability community makes up a solid majority of the battleground electorate, yet few campaigns make sure their materials are fully accessible to everybody despite the clear evidence that it could be electorally rewarding,” said Greenberg. “There is broad agreement among both voters overall and voters within this disability community that more needs to be done to help people with disabilities integrate into the work force, and campaigns would do well to pay more attention to addressing these issues.”

“Candidates for office ignore the disability community at their peril,” added former U.S. Representative and Dallas Mayor Steve Bartlett. Bartlett, who was one of the coauthors of the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, is the chairman of RespectAbility. “The vote of the disability community is not monolithic but attention to disability issues will gather votes for candidates.”

Learn more about how political candidates and campaign staff are reaching out to voters with disabilities on The RespectAbility Report, nonpartisan political commentary on U.S. elections with a focus on disability issues: https://therespectabilityreport.org.

For more information, contact: 

The Margin of Error for this poll is plus or minus 3%.

RespectAbility is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that fights stigmas and advances opportunities so people with disabilities can fully participate in all aspects of their communities. RespectAbility does not rate or endorse candidates.View more coverage of 2020 presidential candidates.

Meet the Author

Eric Ascher
Eric Ascher

Eric Ascher is the Communications Associate for RespectAbility. He is responsible for supporting RespectAbility’s Communications Director in developing and implementing advocacy efforts and communications of various types. Ascher manages RespectAbility’s social media channels, website and emails; organizes and develops webinars; and supervises Communications Fellows.

1 comment… add one

Leave a Reply

Respect Ability - Fighting Stigmas. Advancing Opportunities.

CONTACT US

RespectAbility
HQ: 11333 Woodglen Drive, #102, Rockville, MD 20852
West Coast: 350 S Bixel Street
Los Angeles CA 90017

Office Number: 202-517-6272
info@respectability.org

GUIDESTAR PLATINUM

RespectAbility and TheRespectAbilityReport.org is a GuideStar Platinum Participant. GuideStar Platinum Participant Logo
© 1999-2019 RESPECTABILITY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. SITE DESIGN BY COOL GRAY SEVEN   |   SITE DEVELOPMENT BY WEB SYMPHONIES   |   PRIVACY   |   TERMS OF SERVICE   |   SITEMAP
Translate »